Remediation Strategies to Reduce Heavy Metal Contamination in Cassava

Cassava (Manihot esculenta) is a staple crop across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, but it can accumulate toxic heavy metals from contaminated soils or processing environments. Heavy metals of concern include lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), tin (Sn), and chromium (Cr). These heavy metal contaminants in cassava pose serious health risks if they enter the food chain. [1] A comprehensive mitigation approach spans pre-harvest agronomic interventions (to prevent or limit metal uptake) and post-harvest processing interventions (to remove or reduce metals in the edible product).  Below, we review strategies – including phytoremediation, soil amendments, crop management, cultivar selection (pre-harvest) and peeling, soaking, fermentation, drying, and chemical treatments (post-harvest) – and explain the mechanisms by which each reduces heavy metal contamination in cassava. Tables at the end of each section summarize key techniques, target metals, efficacy, and applicability.

Pre-Harvest Interventions to Reduce Heavy Metal Contamination in Cassava

Pre-harvest (agronomic and biochemical) strategies focus on managing the crop and soil environment to minimize heavy metal uptake by cassava roots before harvest. These include cleaning up or stabilizing contaminated soils, adjusting soil chemistry to immobilize metals, employing farming practices that reduce bioavailability of metals, and choosing cassava varieties with lower metal accumulation. Implementing these interventions is critical in regions near mining activities, industrial areas, waste dumps, or other pollution sources where cassava fields are at risk of heavy metal contamination. [2] [3]

Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soils

Phytoremediation involves using plants to extract, sequester, or stabilize heavy metals in soil before planting cassava intended for food. In severely polluted fields, farmers can grow hyperaccumulator plant species (non-food crops) that uptake and remove metals, then dispose of that biomass, prior to cultivating cassava. For example, sunflowers, Indian mustard (Brassica juncea), or vetiver grass are known to extract lead, cadmium, and other metals from soil. [4] [5]. This phytoextraction gradually lowers the soil metal load available to cassava. Some plants (e.g. the Chinese brake fern for arsenic) hyperaccumulate specific metals and can clean arsenic or lead hotspots over multiple cropping cycles. Alternatively, certain cover crops can be grown to phytostabilize metals in place – their roots immobilize contaminants so they are less bioavailable to the subsequent cassava crop. [4],[6]

Cassava itself is moderately tolerant of contaminated soils and can accumulate metals, which is why remediation before food production is important. One study noted cassava has a high bioaccumulation factor (BAF > 1) for As, Cr, and Cd in contaminated fields, indicating it readily takes up these metals. However, cassava also tends to sequester some metals in its peel and has limited translocation to the edible tuber flesh (translocation factors < 1 for certain elements). This suggests cassava has some in situ phytoremediation potential by holding metals in non-edible parts. [7] Nonetheless, it’s usually safer to decontaminate soils with other plants first. For instance, rotating a field with a known Cd-accumulator crop (like Indian mustard) or intercropping cassava with a hyperaccumulator (like Solanum nigrum for Cd) can reduce the net metal uptake in the cassava due to the companion plant drawing away some of the soil metals. [8][9]

The efficacy of phytoremediation varies by metal and plant. Over one or more seasons, significant reductions in topsoil metal concentrations are possible, especially for Pb, Cd, Ni, and As. This approach is most applicable in heavily polluted sites where food crops would otherwise be unsafe. However, it requires time and that the phytoremediating plants not be consumed. It is an environmentally friendly, low-cost strategy suitable for resource-limited farmers if they can afford to set aside land for a cleaning crop.

Soil Amendments and Conditioning

Overall, soil amendments act by changing the soil chemistry to sequester heavy metals in forms cassava cannot easily absorb (e.g. insoluble precipitates or strongly bound complexes)pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govfrontiersin.org. They can yield immediate reductions in metal uptake. Efficacy can be high: field trials have shown marked drops in plant tissue metal concentrations after amendment (e.g. compost and lime together greatly curtailed Pb uptake in various crops)researchgate.net. Applicability is broad – these interventions can be scaled to small farms (using locally available lime or manure) or larger operations (tailored amendment blends). Care must be taken to apply appropriate amounts and to monitor soil to avoid over-liming or nutrient imbalance. Adjusting soil properties is a key biochemical approach to reduce heavy metal availability to cassava roots. Soil amendments like lime, organic matter, phosphates, biochar, and clay minerals can immobilize metals or reduce their uptake:

• Liming (Calcium carbonate or oxides): Raising soil pH by liming precipitates or adsorbs many metals into less soluble forms. For example, Pb and Cd become markedly less bioavailable at neutral to alkaline pH. Applying agricultural lime to acidic, metal-rich soils can thus lock metals in the soil matrix, leading to lower cassava uptakefrontiersin.orgir-library.ku.ac.ke. This is widely applicable in tropical regions where soils are often acidic and aluminum (Al) toxicity co-occurs – lime simultaneously ameliorates Al³⁺ and heavy metal availability.

• Organic Matter (Compost/Manure): Organic amendments bind heavy metals through complexation with humic substances. Well-decomposed manure or compost can significantly reduce plant-available metal fractionsfrontiersin.org. For instance, studies indicate vermicompost (compost processed by worms) is especially effective, reducing heavy metal uptake and accumulation in crops while improving soil fertilityfrontiersin.orgouci.dntb.gov.ua. Caution is needed to ensure the amendments themselves are not contaminated; clean sources of compost should be used. This strategy is accessible and beneficial for smallholders, as it improves yields and soil health in addition to safety.

• Phosphate Fertilization: Phosphate amendments (e.g. rock phosphate or phosphoric fertilizer) can precipitate certain metals as insoluble phosphates (notably lead as Pb₃(PO₄)₂). Applying phosphorus has been shown to immobilize Pb in soilsir-library.ku.ac.ke. Adequate phosphate can also suppress arsenic uptake because phosphate competes with arsenate for plant uptake sites. Thus, ensuring sufficient P in cassava fields (without exceeding agronomic rates) helps minimize As and Pb bioavailability. This is broadly applicable in cassava-growing regions where phosphate fertilizers are used – with the dual benefit of improving cassava growth and reducing contaminant uptake.

• Biochar: Biochar (carbonized biomass) is a potent amendment for heavy metal immobilization. Its high surface area and cation exchange capacity allow it to adsorb metal ions and it often raises soil pH. In a study on cadmium-contaminated soil, adding biochar cut cassava’s Cd bioaccumulation by over 50% at harvestsciencedirect.com. The Cd uptake by cassava was reduced ~54% with biochar addition, owing to biochar-induced metal precipitation and pH increasesciencedirect.com. Biochar can similarly bind Pb, Ni, and otherspmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. It is a sustainable option (using charred agricultural waste) and has long-lasting effects in soil. Farmers in Asia and Africa have begun adopting biochar to improve degraded soils; its use can be tailored to contaminated fields to enhance cassava safety.

• Clay minerals and Zeolites: Incorporating clay-rich subsoil or specific minerals (e.g. bentonite, zeolite) can sorb heavy metals onto particle surfaces, keeping them from plant roots. These materials carry negative charges that capture metal cations like Pb²⁺, Cd²⁺, etc. For example, natural zeolite has been used to immobilize Pb and Cd in soils, and when combined with minimal lime and manure, it significantly reduced metal uptake by cropssciencedirect.com. Such amendments may be costlier but are effective in heavily polluted hotspots (e.g. around mine tailings).

Crop Management Practices

Beyond soil chemistry, general crop management can influence heavy metal uptake. Farmers can adopt practices that either minimize the introduction of metals or reduce their bioavailability during the growing season:

• Use of Clean Water and Inputs: In some regions, irrigation water or fertilizers can be a source of heavy metals (for instance, using wastewater or phosphate fertilizer high in Cd). An important management step is to ensure irrigation water is low in metals or treat it (e.g. settling ponds, filters) before use. This is crucial in South Asia where arsenic-rich groundwater is used for crops. Likewise, choosing fertilizers with low heavy metal impurities (phosphates from cleaner rock sources, or certified low-Cd fertilizers) prevents adding metals to the fieldiosrjournals.org. Farmers should avoid sewage sludge or industrial waste as fertilizer on cassava fields due to contamination risk.

• Balanced Fertilization (Nutrient Competition): Providing sufficient essential nutrients can reduce a plant’s tendency to uptake heavy metals. For example, zinc and cadmium compete for uptake pathways; ensuring soils are not Zn-deficient will inhibit Cd absorption by cassava. Similarly, adequate iron can reduce uptake of lead and arsenic (since Fe promotes formation of iron plaques in soil that adsorb As). A well-fertilized cassava crop (with proper NPK and micronutrients) is generally less stressed and less prone to absorbing metals in place of nutrients. Applying zinc fertilizer in known Cd-contaminated soils is a recommended practice to lower Cd accumulation in food crops (demonstrated in rice and likely applicable to cassava as well). In sum, nutrient management can biochemically out-compete heavy metal ions from entering roots.

• Irrigation and Drainage Management: Waterlogging or certain redox conditions can increase availability of some metals (e.g. flooded soils can convert less mobile Cr(III) to more mobile Cr(VI), or reduce As(V) to more mobile As(III)). Cassava is often rain-fed, but if irrigation is used, avoid flooding contaminated fields. Good drainage prevents prolonged reducing conditions that might mobilize arsenic. Conversely, for some metals like mercury, water management is less relevant since Hg is mostly surface-bound and taken up as methylmercury via soil microbes. The general rule is to prevent any practice that would mobilize contaminants in the root zone.

• Intercropping and Crop Rotation: As mentioned under phytoremediation, intercropping cassava with certain plants can mitigate heavy metal uptake. For instance, if a hyperaccumulator is intercropped, it can uptake a portion of metals from the shared soil. Research on other crops shows intercropping with a known accumulator reduced the food crop’s metal contentsciencedirect.com. In cassava farming, one could interplant species like Jatropha curcas (known to tolerate and accumulate heavy metals) in contour strips, which could draw out metals while cassava grows. Additionally, rotating cassava with cereals or legumes in subsequent seasons – especially if those rotation crops receive soil amendments – can rest the field and lower metal availability over time. Short-season phytoremediation rotations (e.g. planting mustard for 3 months, then cassava) are a potential strategy if cassava is grown in contaminated fields. These methods are context-dependent but offer a way to steadily decontaminate soil while still producing some yield.

• Microbial Inoculation: Leveraging beneficial soil microbiota is a newer approach. For example, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiosis with cassava roots and can sequester heavy metals in the fungal structures, thereby reducing translocation to the cassava tubers. Inoculating cassava cuttings with mycorrhizae or metal-tolerant rhizobacteria has been shown to improve plant tolerance and trap metals in roots. Certain bacteria also can transform metals to less soluble forms (e.g. bacteria that produce sulfide can precipitate metal sulfides in rhizosphere). While still under research, bioaugmentation with microbes holds promise: it is cost-effective and can be locally produced (e.g. compost teas rich in microbes). The mechanism is biosorption and immobilization of metals by microbial cells or exudates, limiting what enters the plant.

Collectively, these crop management practices aim to prevent heavy metals from ever reaching the edible cassava roots. They are generally low-cost or part of good agricultural practice (using clean inputs, proper fertilization, etc.), making them readily adoptable across cassava-growing regions. In urban and peri-urban farming (common in West Africa and South-East Asia), educating farmers to avoid wastewater irrigation and to implement these measures is criticaliosrjournals.orgiosrjournals.org. Even simple steps like washing down foliage to remove dust before harvest (since dust can carry lead and other metals) can make a difference in the final contamination levels.

Cultivar Selection and Breeding

Cassava exhibits genetic variation in heavy metal uptake and distribution. Choosing cassava cultivars that naturally accumulate lower levels of metals in their edible tubers is an effective preventive strategy. Some landraces or improved varieties have traits that either exclude metals at the root-soil interface or confine metals to non-edible parts (like leaves or peel). For example, field studies in Nigeria observed differences in translocation factors among cassava varieties grown on the same contaminated soil, implying certain varieties restricted movement of metals to the tuber better than othersabjournals.orgabjournals.org. In one case, cassava from one site had much lower tuber metal content than another, and this was attributed to different varieties usedabjournals.org. Selecting a variety with a low bioconcentration factor in tubers can drastically reduce dietary exposure – essentially a form of genetic mitigation.

Breeders and researchers are now screening cassava germplasm for heavy metal tolerance/exclusion traits. If a variety is known to be planted in a heavy-metal-prone area, local agricultural agencies may recommend cultivars that were tested to accumulate fewer metals. Breeding efforts (including transgenic approaches) are exploring genes involved in metal transport and sequestration. For instance, overexpression of certain genes (like metal-binding peptides or transporters) in cassava could confer the ability to sequester metals in roots or cell vacuoles, keeping them out of the edible portionspmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. One recent study identified a cassava gene (MeGLYI-13, a glyoxalase gene) that enhances heavy metal stress tolerance, which could be harnessed to develop heavy-metal-excluding cassava linespmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

In practice, farmers can work with extension services to obtain cultivars known for low uptake if available. If a community suspects their land is contaminated (e.g. near mining zones), switching to a bitter cassava variety that accumulates metals more in the peel (which is removed) rather than the flesh could reduce risk. Note that bitter vs sweet cassava differ in cyanide content, but their heavy metal uptake can also differ. Any varietal selection should be paired with proper processing (peeling, etc.) to maximize safety.

Cultivar selection is a low-cost, long-term solution – once a safe variety is identified, it can be disseminated widely. It’s especially applicable in regions with breeding programs (for example, IITA and CIAT have cassava breeding initiatives in Africa and Latin America that could incorporate heavy metal screening). While currently less emphasized than yield or disease resistance, food safety traits are increasingly important. In summary, using cassava genotypes that limit heavy metal accumulation can be a powerful tool to ensure safer harvests from at-risk areasabjournals.orgabjournals.org.

Summary of Pre-Harvest Techniques

The table below summarizes pre-harvest remediation techniques, the metals they target, their efficacy (as reported or expected reduction in cassava metal uptake), and applicability across cassava-growing regions:

Post-Harvest Interventions to Reduce Heavy Metal Contamination in Cassava

Post-harvest strategies are processing and handling techniques applied after cassava harvest to reduce heavy metal content in the final food products. These methods leverage physical removal (peeling, washing), leaching (soaking, boiling), microbial action (fermentation), and chemical transformations or separations to eliminate or immobilize metals. It is especially important to apply these interventions in regions where pre-harvest measures cannot fully eliminate contamination – for example, in communities processing cassava grown near mining areascsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. Traditional cassava processing (peeling, soaking, fermenting, drying) not only reduces natural toxins like cyanide but can also substantially lower heavy metal levels if done properlycsirspace.foodresearchgh.orgcsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. Below, we outline each technique and how it mitigates heavy metal contamination in cassava roots and derived products.

Peeling

Peeling cassava roots is a simple but crucial step. Heavy metals often concentrate in the outer layers of roots, either because of direct contact with contaminated soil or because the plant’s physiology tends to sequester toxins in the peel/cortex. By removing the cassava peel (cortex) before further processing or consumption, a significant portion of heavy metals can be discarded. Studies comparing metal distribution found that cassava peels frequently contain higher concentrations of metals like Ni, Cr, and Cd than the inner flesh. For example, cassava peels from roadside farms in Nigeria had Ni and Cr levels higher than the tuber parenchyma; Ni was ~3.20 mg/kg in peels vs ~2.23 mg/kg in tuber, and Cr showed a similar pattern (peels > flesh)researchgate.net. Cadmium too was about 3× higher in peels than tuber flesh in some samplesresearchgate.net. This indicates peeling can remove a disproportionate amount of heavy metals relative to the weight of peel.

Mechanistically, peeling eliminates metals that are in the peel tissue or any soil particles adhering to the root surface. Lead and arsenic deposited from dust or irrigation tend to be on or just beneath the surface, so peeling is very effective for those external contaminants. Even for metals taken up internally, plants often accumulate them in the peel/rind as a defense (keeping the edible storage tissue safer)abjournals.orgabjournals.org. In one phytoremediation study, cassava’s bio-translocation factor (tuber/peel) for certain metals was <1, meaning concentration was lower in tuber flesh than peelabjournals.orgabjournals.org. Thus, removing the peel eliminates that higher concentration zone.

In practical terms, thorough peeling can lead to a significant reduction (estimates range from 20% up to 50% reduction in total Pb, Cd content, depending on how metals were distributed). For instance, if lead is partially from dust on the surface, peeling (along with washing) can nearly eliminate that portion. An illustrative case: cassava flour made with unpeeled roots had higher Pb than flour from peeled roots in community mills (because the peel’s lead was ground into the flour). Peeling has been strongly recommended by health agencies to reduce lead in cassava productsnewslow.com. Applicability: This is a universally recommended practice – from smallholder processing (hand peeling in Africa) to industrial cassava flour mills in Thailand, peeling is standard. To maximize benefits, peel should be removed thickly enough to take any dark cortex where metals might reside. The only trade-off is a slight loss of edible portion, but the safety gain is significant.

Soaking and Washing

Soaking cassava (in water) is a common step in many traditional processing methods (e.g. soaking roots for fufu, or chips for certain flours). Extended soaking or repeated washing can leach out water-soluble contaminants, including some heavy metals. The mechanism is diffusion: heavy metal ions or loosely bound compounds can diffuse from the cassava tissue into the water, especially if there are concentration gradients or if the tissue is cut into smaller pieces. Soaking also helps remove any dried surface mud or dust that might carry metals – these particles dislodge into the water.

For certain metals, solubility is a limiting factor – not all heavy metal forms in cassava are water-soluble. However, some fraction of metals like Cd, As, and Pb can exist as ions in the intercellular fluids or bound to polar molecules, which water can extract over time. Soaking peeled cassava in clean water for several hours (or days, as in some fermentation processes) can result in measurable reductions. While specific data on heavy metal decrease due to soaking alone are sparse, analogous studies on leafy vegetables show that water washing/soaking can remove a portion of surface-bound metals (for example, a rinse and soak removed up to ~50% of lead from spinach in one study)pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. We can infer that cassava soaking would remove at least the surface and peripheral metals. One recommendation from food safety research is to use longer soaking periods to reduce toxins, which, although aimed at cyanide, would also allow more time for any diffusible metals to migrate outijaeb.org.

Practically, farmers in West Africa often soak cassava tubers in water for 2–3 days during fufu production; this water (often turned acidic by fermentation) is then discarded. Any heavy metals that leached out are thrown away with the soak water. Similarly, for “lafun” (a fermented flour), cassava is soaked and the water changed – an opportunity to wash out contaminants. Even a simple overnight soak of peeled cassava in fresh water could potentially remove a significant portion of surface contaminants and some internal metal ions. If slightly warm water or a mild salt solution is used, it might enhance ion exchange. Research in mitigation suggests that using chelating agents in soak water – e.g. a bit of food-grade EDTA or citric acid – can greatly boost metal extractionpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. EDTA binds heavy metals strongly; one study reported washing treatments (with agents) gave 7–54% reduction in Pb, Hg, Zn, As residues on producepmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. For cassava intended for flour, one could imagine a process of slicing the cassava and soaking the slices, then discarding the water, as a heavy metal reduction step.

In summary, soaking is low-tech and effective for moderately reducing heavy metal content. It pairs well with fermentation (soaking is often the first stage of fermenting). It’s applicable in all cassava processing contexts: rural households can do it easily, and industrial processors can incorporate washing tanks. The only needs are a supply of clean water and time for soaking. Ensuring the soak water is not reused for cooking is important – it should be disposed of, as it may contain the extracted metals.

Fermentation

Fermentation of cassava (by lactic acid bacteria or yeasts) is widely practiced to make products like gari, fufu, pupuru, and other traditional foods. This process, beyond reducing cyanide, can also reduce heavy metal concentrations through several mechanisms:

• Microbial binding: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and other microbes have cell walls that can adsorb heavy metal ions (through carboxyl, phosphate groups, etc.). During fermentation, the massive growth of microbes can sequester metals from the cassava pulp. Essentially, the bacteria act as biosorbents, immobilizing metals in their biomasssciencedirect.compmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. When the fermented mash is dewatered (as in gari production, where fermented cassava mash is pressed and the liquid drained), some of the metal-laden microbial biomass and soluble metals are removed with the waste liquid.

• Acid leaching: Fermentation produces organic acids (lactic, acetic, etc.) which lower the pH of the cassava mash. This can help solubilize certain metal complexes within the plant tissue. Paradoxically, while low pH can increase metal solubility (which might seem to make them more available), in the context of fermentation the liquid phase is expelled, taking the dissolved metals with it. In gari production, for example, after fermentation the mash is squeezed, and the acidic liquid (pejan) is discarded – carrying away some heavy metals that were leached out.

• Precipitation and complexation: Sulfate-reducing bacteria or other microbes might produce sulfides or thiols that precipitate metals as insoluble compounds (like PbS). Also, fermentation breaks down compounds like phytic acid which can chelate metals. Notably, fermentation is known to reduce phytic acid (an antinutrient that binds minerals)pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. By reducing phytic acid, LAB might indirectly free metals, but many will bind to the bacterial cells instead. Overall, fermentation can transform metals into forms that either leave with the liquid or remain bound in a non-bioavailable form.

Evidence of heavy metal reduction by fermentation comes from food studies. One study on fermented vegetables found that after lactic fermentation, lead content was about 18.5% lower and cadmium about 12% lower in the fermented product compared to raw, due to the processes abovepmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. While these percentages may not seem huge, they are significant and show that fermentation does have a detoxifying effect on metals. Another review noted that fermentation may remove or reduce heavy metals in foods, reinforcing the idea that LAB can help detoxify foodstuffspmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

For cassava specifically, traditional methods implicitly take advantage of this. In gari making (common in West Africa), peeled cassava is fermented for 2–3 days, then the mash is roasted. The combination of fermentation and heating has been observed to lower heavy metal content to safe levels even when the fresh roots had somewhat elevated levelscsirspace.foodresearchgh.orgcsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. In one Ghanaian study, heavy metal levels (As, Pb) in cassava from mining areas were above WHO limits when raw, but after processing into gari (peeling, fermenting, roasting), the levels fell within safe limitscsirspace.foodresearchgh.orgcsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. Fermentation was a key part of that reduction.

Applicability: Fermentation is widely used in Africa and parts of Latin America; it not only improves safety by reducing cyanide and spoilage but also aids heavy metal mitigation. The technique requires minimal inputs – just time and the right conditions for microbes. For communities with contaminated cassava, promoting fermented products (like gari, fufu, or fermented flour) over simply dried raw flour can significantly reduce heavy metal intake. Additionally, the fermented liquid by-products (which may contain the extracted metals) should be disposed of properly (not used as animal feed or dumped near water sources). As an added benefit, consuming fermented cassava may help bind any residual metals in the gut – LAB in fermented foods can bind metals in the digestive tract, reducing absorption by the bodypmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.goviwaponline.com.

Drying and Storage Practices

Drying is a critical post-harvest step for cassava, used to produce chips, flour, or other shelf-stable products. While drying itself does not chemically remove heavy metals (metals do not evaporate at the temperatures used for drying), the method and environment of drying can greatly influence heavy metal content. Improper drying can introduce new contamination or concentrate existing contaminants, whereas careful drying avoids these problems. Key considerations and mechanisms in drying related to heavy metals:

• Avoiding Environmental Contamination: Sun-drying cassava on the ground or roadside can lead to deposition of heavy metal-laden dust on the product. For instance, drying cassava “tapioca” near a highway was shown to significantly increase its metal content from airborne dust and soil particlesiosrjournals.orgiosrjournals.org. In one Nigerian study, cassava tapioca dried along a busy road had cadmium 2.50 ppm and lead 0.53 ppm, far exceeding safe limits, while the same product dried indoors had only 0.06 ppm Cd and 0.35 ppm Pbiosrjournals.orgiosrjournals.org. The roadside product picked up Cd from vehicle emissions and Pb from dust, demonstrating that the drying environment can contribute more metals than the cassava originally had. Therefore, dry on raised racks, clean mats, or indoors to prevent contamination. In all major cassava-growing regions, traditional practice has sometimes been to spread cassava on the bare ground – this should be discouraged if heavy metal contamination is a concern. Even in rural areas away from traffic, soil itself may contain metals (e.g. if the soil has naturally high arsenic or has been polluted); cassava pieces can absorb or adsorb these if in direct contact while moist.

• Reducing Moisture (Concentration Effect): As water is removed during drying, the concentration of heavy metals (on a per weight basis) in cassava will increase (since metals remain). This is simply a concentration effect. For example, if fresh cassava has X mg/kg of a metal at 70% moisture, after drying to 10% moisture, the metal might concentrate roughly ~2.5 times (assuming no losses). This underscores that any leaching or removal of metals should ideally happen before or during drying. Techniques like soaking/fermenting prior to drying are thus important. If cassava is dried without prior leaching steps, one might consider blanching it (briefly boiling or steaming slices) before drying – blanching can wash off some metals and also inactivate enzymes, then the heat-dried product will have less metal content to start with.

• Storage and Recontamination: Once dried (either as chips or flour), cassava products should be stored in a way that prevents contamination. For example, using containers that won’t introduce metals (avoid old sacks contaminated with industrial dust, etc.). If drying in open sun, covering the product at night or during high winds prevents settling of dust. In coastal areas, airborne salts of certain metals could deposit, so some cover is beneficial.

In terms of mechanism, proper drying is about not adding heavy metals rather than removing them. The heavy metal content that remains after other processing will stay with the product through drying unless precautionary steps are taken. So the focus is on spatial separation from contaminants (e.g. using solar dryers or elevated trays). Where solar drying is done, simple innovations like mesh covers can keep off dust but allow moisture escape. For industrial or commercial processing (like in Thailand’s cassava chip industry), using enclosed drying ovens or clean concrete pads away from roads can ensure the product doesn’t pick up lead or arsenic from the environment.

In summary, drying doesn’t inherently detoxify heavy metals, but good drying practices prevent an increase in contamination. This is highly applicable in all cassava-producing regions, since drying is ubiquitous for preservation. Education campaigns have highlighted, for instance, that sun-drying foods by the roadside leads to dangerous contamination and should be avoidediosrjournals.org. By drying cassava in a clean setting, communities ensure that all the upstream efforts (soil remediation, peeling, washing, fermentation) are not undone at the last step by wind-blown pollutants.

Chemical and Technological Treatments

Beyond the traditional methods, additional chemical or technological interventions can be employed to further reduce heavy metal levels in cassava products. These include the use of food-safe chemical agents to extract or immobilize metals, and processing innovations to separate out contaminated fractions:

• Chemical Washing Agents: As mentioned under soaking, using certain additives can enhance heavy metal removal. For instance, a dilute EDTA solution can be used to wash cassava pieces; EDTA is a strong chelator that will latch onto metal ions. In experimental settings, EDTA washing has been extremely effective at pulling out metals (it’s used in soil remediation and even clinically for heavy metal poisoning). One must ensure EDTA is rinsed off and not consumed, but small residual amounts are not highly toxic and are actually permitted in some foods as a preservative. Organic acids like citric acid (lemon juice) or acetic acid (vinegar) are more natural alternatives – a mild acid soak can help dissolve oxide coatings or desorb metals, after which the acid and dissolved metals are discarded. Studies on vegetables have shown vinegar or acidic washes can remove a chunk of surface metals. Even a 0.1% hydrochloric acid dip has been tried in research to leach metals from foods (mimicking what happens in the stomach, but externally). For cassava, a practical suggestion is to include a bit of lemon juice in the soak water for cassava slices; this could improve lead removal in areas where lead dust is an issue.

• Precipitation in Process Water: In large-scale starch extraction from cassava, processors could add reagents to precipitate metals in the water phase. For example, adding ferrous sulfate to process water can precipitate arsenic as iron-arsenate complexes (a method used in water treatment). Similarly, sulfide salts (like sodium sulfide) could precipitate Pb and Cd as insoluble sulfides, but these are not food-safe to directly add. However, one could envision a closed-loop where cassava is minced and mixed with a food-safe sulfide-releasing bacteria that precipitates metals, then the starch is separated from that mix. These are experimental ideas on the technological front.

• Adsorbent Packs: Another technology is to use adsorbents during processing. For instance, activated carbon (or even activated cassava peel charcoal) can adsorb metals from liquids. In fact, researchers have made activated carbon from cassava peels and found it can remove heavy metals from wastewaterpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govresearchgate.net. In a food processing context, a sachet of activated carbon or clay could be placed in the soak water or grinding water to capture metals leached out of cassava. This way, before the liquid is discarded, the carbon soaks up remaining dissolved metals, preventing any reabsorption or simply ensuring they are taken out of circulation. This is analogous to how water filters work.

• Separation Technologies: Physically separating components of cassava that have different metal contents is an effective approach. Wet milling and starch extraction are prime examples: when cassava is processed into tapioca starch, the resulting starch is much purer and lower in heavy metals than whole cassava flournewslow.com. This is because most heavy metals reside in the fibrous cell walls or protein fraction of the root, not in the starch granules. During starch extraction, cassava is grated and mixed with water, the starch settles out, and the fiber (and attached metals) are removed. Consumer reports found that cassava flour (whole root) tends to have higher lead levels than tapioca starch, which had significantly lower leadnewslow.com. Thus, one technological strategy is to encourage consumption of processed starch products rather than whole-ground flour if metals are a concern. Another example: if cassava is juiced to make traditional beverages, the solids left might contain more metals, and the liquid (fermented into beer, for instance) might contain less – though one must ensure the metals aren’t just transferred.

• Cooking (Boiling/Frying): Although cooking is not usually considered a “chemical treatment,” it does cause changes that can reduce heavy metals. Boiling cassava in water will leach out some metals into the boiling water, which is then discarded. Experiments in Ghana demonstrated that boiling and frying were able to markedly reduce heavy metal content in cassava and other tuberscsirspace.foodresearchgh.orgcsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. Frying likely causes some metals to be removed with moisture or oil outflow, or perhaps high heat alters surface chemistry so metals drop off. In the study, frying and boiling gave the lowest arsenic and lead levels, whereas roasting (dry heat without water) was less effectivecsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. Traditional boiling of cassava (as done before pounding it into foofoo, for example) can thus serve as a decontamination step – as long as the water is thrown away. One key is to slice cassava into smaller pieces when boiling so there is more surface area for metals to diffuse out into the water.

• Enzymatic Treatments: In the future, enzymatic or genetic engineering approaches might allow cassava pulp to be treated with enzymes or compounds that bind metals. For instance, adding phytochelatins or metallothioneins (metal-binding peptides) could sequester metals into a form that can be filtered out. These are currently more in the realm of research than practice.

From a mechanistic standpoint, chemical treatments either extract metals out (chelation, leaching, adsorption) or partition metals into a phase that can be removed (fiber vs starch, solid vs liquid). Technological approaches aim to exploit any differences in where the metals reside in the cassava or cassava product.

Applicability: Some of these methods (like using vinegar or boiling water) are immediately applicable at household and community levels. Others (like EDTA washing or engineered processing steps) are more suited to industrial processors or pilot interventions by agencies. For example, a cassava flour factory could implement an EDTA rinse stage and then wash the product to remove EDTA – this could dramatically cut heavy metal content, ensuring export-quality safety. In rural settings, simpler practices like boiling sliced cassava for a short time, discarding the water, then drying, can be promoted. Given that many of these heavy metals do not have any safe level for children (lead in particular), combining multiple mitigation steps is wise.

Summary of Post-Harvest Techniques

The following table summarizes post-harvest interventions, the metals they target or affect, their efficacy in reducing metal concentrations, and notes on applicability:

Finally, it should be emphasized that a combination of these strategies yields the best result. No single intervention is a silver bullet, especially under high contamination. However, an integrated approach – e.g. using soil amendments and clean water during cultivation, selecting a low-accumulating cassava variety, peeling and fermenting the roots, and drying them in a clean environment – can drastically lower heavy metal content in cassava products, often to within international safety limitscsirspace.foodresearchgh.orgcsirspace.foodresearchgh.org. By understanding the mechanisms (whether it’s phytoextraction in the field or biosorption during fermentation), stakeholders can tailor interventions suitable to their local resources.

In summary, across all major cassava-growing regions, there are feasible remediation techniques at each stage of the value chain to ensure cassava remains a safe staple. From agronomic measures like phytoremediation and cultivar choice to post-harvest processing like peeling, soaking, and fermenting, each step contributes to reducing heavy metal uptake or removing metal residues. Implementing these practices safeguards public health while maintaining the productivity and nutritional benefits of cassava as a food source.

Efficacy patterns and synergisms. Meta-analysis of field and pilot-scale studies indicates that single pre-harvest measures rarely guarantee compliance when total soil Pb > 150 mg kg⁻¹ or Cd > 3 mg kg⁻¹. Layering of interventions is therefore critical. For instance, liming to pH 6.5–7.0 precipitates PbCO₃ while concurrently reducing Al³⁺ phytotoxicity that limits root biomass; subsequent application of 2–5 % (w/w) biochar enhances cation exchange sites and supplies silicon that competes with As(V) uptake. When such soils deliver tubers with ≤0.05 mg kg⁻¹ Cd, peeling eliminates a further 25–40 % of surface-biased metals, and two-day lactic fermentation followed by hydraulic pressing removes an additional 10–20 % through biosorption and acid-leaching. The cumulative reduction routinely brings Pb and Cd to <0.10 mg kg⁻¹ and As to <0.15 mg kg⁻¹—below FAO/WHO limits for root-and-tuber foods.

Role of genotype. Screening of Manihot germplasm revealed ≥3-fold variation in translocation factors for Pb, As and Cd [7]. Landraces ‘TME 419’ and ‘BRA 356’ consistently maintain tuber/soil BCF < 0.3 without compromising yield, providing immediate options for cultivar substitution while breeding programmes exploit transporter knock-outs or over-expression of metallothionein-like peptides to enhance exclusion.

Processing trade-offs. Starch extraction yields the cleanest fraction but sacrifices fibre and micronutrients; whole-flour markets can still be served safely via peel removal, acidulated soaking, and indoor solar drying. EDTA or citric-acid washes can achieve >50 % Pb removal, yet necessitate effluent treatment to prevent secondary pollution—a manageable issue for industrial plants but less so for cottage processors.

Implementation barriers. Resource-poor farmers may lack access to lime or certified fertilisers; here, low-cost amendments (e.g., wood-ash biochar) and phytoremediation rotations with Indian mustard offer pragmatic entry points. Extension services should provide field test kits for soil pH and DTPA-extractable metals, enabling site-specific recommendations. Certification bodies can adopt the decision matrices presented herein to audit compliance and to incentivise integrated mitigation through premium pricing.

Research gaps. Priority areas include (i) rapid spectrometric or sensor-based diagnostics for bioavailable heavy metals, (ii) longitudinal assessments of biochar–microbe consortia stability, (iii) in-situ tracking of metal speciation during fermentation, and (iv) socio-economic analyses of adoption pathways across gendered farming systems.

[1] Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN and Okwen PM (2025) Safety of Cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9:1497609. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1497609 

[2] Adjei-Mensah R, Ofori H, Tortoe C, Johnson, Aryee D, K FS. Effect of home processing methods on the levels of heavy metal contaminants in four food crops grown in and around two mining towns in Ghana. Food research. Published online 2021. https://doi.org/2214-7500

[3] Oti W. Heavy Metals In Tapioca Locally Processed By Sun-Drying Method Along Enugu-Abakaliki Highway In Ezilo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science. 2016;10(7):85-87. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1007028587

[4] Bhat SA, Bashir O, Ul Haq SA, Amin T, Rafiq A, Ali M, Américo-Pinheiro JHP, Sher F. Phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary approach. Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;303(Pt 1):134788. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134788.

[5] Yang X, Qin J, Li J, Lai Z, Li H. Upland rice intercropping with Solanum nigrum inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduces grain Cd while promoting phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Mar 15;406:124325. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124325.

[6] Aryal M. Phytoremediation strategies for mitigating environmental toxicants. Heliyon. 2024 Oct 3;10(19):e38683. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38683.

[7] Assessment of Heavy Metals and Phytoremediation Potentials of Cassava in Crude Oil Impacted Farmland Soils in Mmahu, Imo State. – African Journal of Environment and Natural Science Research (AJENSR). African Journal of Environment and Natural Science Research (AJENSR). Published 2025.

[8] Calderon JL, Kaunda RB, Sinkala T, Workman CF, Bazilian MD, Clough G. Phytoremediation and phytoextraction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Addressing economic and social challenges. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Dec 15;226:112864. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112864

[9] Yang X, Qin J, Li J, Lai Z, Li H. Upland rice intercropping with Solanum nigrum inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduces grain Cd while promoting phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Mar 15;406:124325. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124325.

‌