Accumulation of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains cultivated in three major industrial areas of Bangladesh Original paper

Researched by:

  • Dr. Umar Aitsaam ID
    Dr. Umar Aitsaam

    User avatarClinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

    Read More

January 31, 2026

Researched by:

  • Dr. Umar Aitsaam ID
    Dr. Umar Aitsaam

    User avatarClinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

    Read More
Dr. Umar Aitsaam

Clinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

What was studied

This study quantified heavy metal accumulation in rice grown in three industrialized regions of Bangladesh by measuring paired concentrations of Fe, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Co, Ni, and As in paddy soils and harvested rice grains, then calculating soil-to-grain transfer factors (TFs). Using atomic absorption spectrophotometry after microwave digestion, the authors compared measured grain concentrations against WHO/FAO maximum tolerance values to identify which elements most often exceeded food-safety benchmarks and which metals showed the greatest mobility from soil into edible grain—two parameters directly relevant to setting certification pass/fail criteria and prioritizing routine surveillance for heavy-metal accumulation in rice risk.

Who was studied

No human participants were enrolled. The sampled “population” consisted of agricultural fields and rice harvests in three major industrial areas—Savar, Gazipur, and Ashulia—where residents grow staple rice in environments influenced by industrial effluent and wastewater impacts. Soil was collected as replicate composites from multiple field locations, and rice grain samples (high-yielding variety BRRI Dhan 28) were collected from the same fields between April and August 2021, supporting a matched soil–grain exposure pathway assessment for heavy-metal accumulation in rice in an industrial-agricultural interface.

Most important findings

Across sites, several metals in rice grain exceeded the stated WHO/FAO tolerance values, and TF results showed that some metals (notably Zn and Cu) transfer efficiently from soil into grain, meaning certification programs should not rely on soil tests alone.

Critical pointDetails
Multiple grain exceedances vs tolerancesMean rice concentrations for Zn (97.34–121.76 mg/kg), Cd (0.98–1.61 mg/kg), Cr (11.54–23.67 mg/kg), and Co (8.54–18.11 mg/kg) exceeded the paper’s listed WHO/FAO tolerance values (Zn 60, Cd 0.3, Cr 5, Co 0.2 mg/kg), indicating frequent noncompliance risk in rice sourced from these industrial belts.
Soil contamination profile differs from grain riskSoils showed high Fe (668–976 mg/kg) and notable Cd (11.08–18.56 mg/kg), Pb (34.09–42.78 mg/kg), Cr (34.87–46.93 mg/kg), Co (19.56–43.09 mg/kg), and Ni (43.25–51.76 mg/kg), but grain rankings differed (Zn > Cu > Cr > Co > Fe > Cd > Pb > Ni > As), underscoring that “highest in soil” is not automatically “highest in edible grain.”
High transfer factors identify priority control pointsTFs were highest for Zn (1.19–1.65) and Cu (0.67–1.28), with moderate values for Cr (0.28–0.68) and Co (~0.42–0.44). Metals with TF >1 imply grain can concentrate relative to soil, making them prime candidates for stricter lot-level testing in HMTC-style programs.
Low TF does not equal “no concern”Pb TF was ~0–0.04, As TF ~0.01–0.02, and Ni TF ~0–0.003, yet Pb and As remain high-consequence toxicants; low average TF can still yield actionable grain detections when soil is highly contaminated or when milling/processing concentrates residues in certain fractions.
Site-to-site variability matters for certification samplingMean grain Cd ranged from 0.98 (Gazipur) to 1.61 mg/kg (Ashulia), and Cr ranged from 11.54 (Gazipur) to 23.67 mg/kg (Ashulia), suggesting certification sampling plans should stratify by sourcing region and industrial proximity rather than treating a country/region as uniform.

Key implications

For HMTC-style oversight, the primary regulatory impact is that grain-based limits must be enforced because soil contamination does not reliably predict edible risk, especially for Zn and Cu with TF >1. Certification requirements should mandate routine batch testing of rice (or rice-derived ingredients) for Cd, Cr, Co, and Zn using validated digestion/AAS or ICP methods and include region-stratified sampling in industrial corridors. Industry applications include supplier qualification tied to field location and periodic verification testing to manage heavy metal accumulation in rice. Research gaps include limited seasonality, cultivar diversity, and broader geographic baselines, so practical recommendations are to expand surveillance across seasons/varieties and pair grain testing with upstream controls on industrial effluent and irrigation water quality.

Citation

Hasan GMM Anwarul, Das AK, Satter MA. Accumulation of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains cultivated in three major industrial areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2022;2022:1836597. doi:10.1155/2022/1836597

Cadmium (Cd)

Cadmium is a persistent heavy metal that accumulates in kidneys and bones. Dietary sources include cereals, cocoa, shellfish and vegetables, while smokers and industrial workers receive higher exposures. Studies link cadmium to kidney dysfunction, bone fractures and cancer.

Lead (Pb)

Lead is a neurotoxic heavy metal with no safe exposure level. It contaminates food, consumer goods and drinking water, causing cognitive deficits, birth defects and cardiovascular disease. HMTC’s rigorous lead testing applies ALARA principles to protect infants and consumers and to prepare brands for tightening regulations.

Chromium (Cr)

Chromium (Cr) is a widely used metal with significant public health implications, especially in its toxic hexavalent form. The HMTC program’s stricter regulations ensure that chromium exposure is minimized, safeguarding consumer health, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Nickel (Ni)

Nickel is a widely used transition metal found in alloys, batteries, and consumer products that also contaminates food and water. High exposure is linked to allergic contact dermatitis, organ toxicity, and developmental effects, with children often exceeding EFSA’s tolerable daily intake of 3 μg/kg bw. Emerging evidence shows nickel crosses the placenta, elevating risks of preterm birth and congenital heart defects, underscoring HMTC’s stricter limits to safeguard vulnerable populations.

Tin (Sn)

Tin and its compounds, especially organotins, pose significant health risks ranging from neurological effects to reproductive toxicity. The HMTC program's stringent certification standards aim to minimize these risks and protect consumer health.