Phytoremediation and Phytoextraction in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Dual Solution for Remediation and Revenue

September 28, 2025

What was reviewed?This review paper evaluates the potential of phytoremediation and phytoextraction as

Last Updated: 2025-09-28

Our team of researchers are constantly monitoring and summarizing the latest research,
and we continue to update our pages to ensure you have the most accurate information.

Note on the last update: One new meta analysis added

Karen Pendergrass

Karen Pendergrass is a researcher specializing microbial metallomics and microbiome signatures, with a focus on bridging research and clinical practice. She is the co-founder of several initiatives, including Microbiome Signatures and the Heavy Metal Tested & Certified program, which translate complex science into actionable standards.

What was reviewed?

This review paper evaluates the potential of phytoremediation and phytoextraction as cost-effective strategies to address heavy metal pollution caused by mining activities in Sub-Saharan Africa, a region suffering from widespread environmental degradation and inadequate governance. The authors present a conceptual approach that combines phytoremediation with economic valorization through phyto-mining, proposing the sale of extracted metals to fund remediation efforts and support local economies. The paper emphasizes the viability of hyperaccumulator plants in cleaning up heavy metal-contaminated soils while yielding saleable metals, especially cobalt and copper. It outlines the social and financial barriers hindering implementation. This review explores phytoremediation and phytoextraction as cost-effective solutions for mining pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting hyperaccumulator plants that can remediate heavy metal-contaminated land and generate income through metal recovery, with implications for heavy metal testing and certification, remediation, and ethical sourcing.

Who was reviewed?

The review focuses on communities across Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly those impacted by industrial and artisanal mining in regions like the Zambian and Katanga Copperbelts. It highlights the lack of environmental governance in countries such as Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Zimbabwe. These areas suffer from extreme environmental degradation, health risks associated with heavy metal exposure, and food insecurity due to contamination of staple crops like cassava and sweet potatoes. Hyperaccumulator species such as Haumaniastrum robertii and Aeolanthus biformifolius from the Central African Copperbelt are discussed as local solutions to these region-specific challenges.

Most important findings

The review identifies several core insights highly relevant to heavy metal testing, certification, and manufacturing reform. Heavy metal contamination from mining—including cobalt, lead, cadmium, nickel, and copper—is widespread and persistent across Sub-Saharan Africa, posing serious environmental and public health risks. The situation is further compounded by weak governance scores across many countries in the region, as shown in Table 1 (page 4), which limit the enforcement of environmental safeguards and the implementation of remediation strategies.

In response, the authors highlight phytoremediation and phytoextraction as scalable, low-cost solutions, particularly suited to regions with limited infrastructure and funding. These techniques utilize native hyperaccumulator plants such as Haumaniastrum robertii and Aeolanthus biformifolius, which are capable of accumulating up to 1 wt% of cobalt and copper, respectively, making substantial recovery of metals from contaminated soils feasible, as demonstrated in Table 2 (page 5). Even after phytoextraction becomes economically unviable, phytoremediation can continue to deliver value through the production of biofuels, bioenergy, or biomass-derived fertilizers. When supported by economic incentives and community engagement, this approach can transform toxic, post-mining landscapes into food-grade agricultural land, creating long-term environmental and economic benefits.

Revenue Potential of Phytomining (adapted from Table 2, page 5)

PlantMetalYield (T/Ha/Yr)Price/TonneLand Used (Ha)Annual Revenue
H. robertii (Conservative)Cobalt0.2$31,37410,000$62,748,000
A. biformifolius (Conservative)Copper0.2$6,65010,000$13,300,000

Key implications

The review ultimately calls for the urgent integration of phytoremediation into both policy and practice, emphasizing the use of certification, traceability, and value recovery as key mechanisms to overcome socioeconomic barriers.  It advocates a shift from reliance on weak governance structures toward self-sustaining, community-driven remediation strategies rooted in nature-based solutions. This has significant implications for environmental safety certification, heavy metal testing, and the development of sustainable remediation practices. Certification programs operating in contaminated regions could recognize phytoremediation as an eligible remediation method, provided the extracted metals meet established safety thresholds. Phytomining presents an economic pathway to fund remediation efforts without external financing, offering an appealing model for public-private partnerships and development initiatives.

For manufacturers—particularly in the tech and automotive sectors that depend on cobalt from Sub-Saharan Africa—the inclusion of certified, phytomined metals into supply chains could strengthen ethical sourcing commitments. Additionally, a Heavy Metal Tested and Certified label could be broadened to include land or biomass products that have undergone validated phytoremediation. To ensure successful implementation, the review highlights the importance of educational outreach, robust economic feasibility assessments, and technical training—areas where certification bodies can play a pivotal role by supporting capacity-building programs.

Citation

Lee J, Kaunda RB, Sinkala T, Workman CF, Bazilian MD, Clough G. Phytoremediation and phytoextraction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Addressing economic and social challenges.Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;226:112864. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112864

Research Feed

Prenatal Heavy Metal Exposure and Infant Neurodevelopment: Risks of Cadmium, Nickel, Lead, and Mercury
September 23, 2025

Prenatal cadmium and nickel exposure negatively impact infant neurodevelopment, particularly expressive language. Heavy metal mixtures demonstrate cumulative risks, underscoring the need for stricter food safety thresholds and mixture-based risk assessments to protect vulnerable populations.

What was studied? This study investigated the effects of prenatal heavy metal exposure and infant neurodevelopment, considering the adverse effects of multiple heavy metals—cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb). Heavy metal levels were measured in maternal urine samples collected at the 12th week of gestation, while infant neurodevelopment was assessed at 40 days using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. The study applied multiple statistical approaches, including Generalized Additive Models (GAM), Multivariable Linear Regression (MLR) with restricted cubic splines (RCS), Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR), and Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression, to evaluate both individual and joint effects of these metals on early neurodevelopment. Who was studied? The study examined 400 mother-infant pairs recruited from a community-based birth cohort in Tarragona, Spain, between 2013 and 2017. Mothers were recruited during their initial prenatal visits, and urine samples were analyzed for metal concentrations using ICP-MS/MS with creatinine adjustment. Infants were assessed at 40 days old by trained psychologists, focusing on cognitive, language, and motor domains. The mothers had a mean age of 30.9 years, with most belonging to a low- or middle-socioeconomic class, and nearly 70% reported never smoking. Infants were almost evenly split between male and female, with 74.5% breastfed. Most important findings Cadmium was consistently associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. GAM and MLR analyses confirmed a negative linear association between Cd exposure and both cognitive and expressive language scores (β = −1.47 and β = −0.32, respectively, both statistically significant). Pb demonstrated a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship with language development, indicating risk at both low and high exposure levels. WQS regression revealed that mixtures of heavy metals were significantly associated with impaired expressive language development (β = −0.26, 95% CI = −0.44, −0.07), with Cd and Ni identified as the main contributors. BKMR analyses supported an overall negative trend for metal mixtures, though not statistically significant. Mercury exposure showed no consistent associations. Key implications The study highlights that prenatal heavy metal exposure and infant neurodevelopment are particularly negatively impacted by cadmium and nickel exposure, with expressive language being the most vulnerable domain. The findings underscore the limitations of focusing on single-metal exposures, as real-world scenarios typically involve complex mixtures. Importantly for a certification program such as Heavy Metal Tested and Certified (HMTC), the evidence supports the inclusion of cadmium and nickel within the Infant and Child Foods Standards alongside lead and mercury as priority metals for regulatory thresholds, given their demonstrable neurodevelopmental risks even at low levels of prenatal exposure. These results emphasize the urgency of establishing stricter heavy metal limits in foods consumed by pregnant women, since dietary intake is a major source of exposure. For industry, compliance with reduced heavy metal thresholds is not only protective of infant health but also scientifically justified by evidence linking prenatal exposure to cognitive and language deficits in early life. For regulators, the study validates the need for mixture-based risk assessment approaches, moving beyond single-metal evaluations to capture the cumulative effects on vulnerable populations. Citation Kou X, Palleja-Millan M, Canals J, Rivera Moreno V, Renzetti S, Arija V. Effects of prenatal exposure to multiple heavy metals on infant neurodevelopment: A multi-statistical approach. Environmental Pollution. 2025;367:125647. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125647.
Widespread Heavy Metals in Baby Food Reveal Urgent Regulatory Gaps

This review reveals significant gaps in U.S. policy governing toxic heavy metals in baby food, highlighting widespread contamination, lack of binding standards, and underreporting due to flawed testing practices.

References

  1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563217706381. Davies M, Sarri G, Lumsden MA.. (Ann Clin Biochem. 2017;54(5):516-518.)

Davies M, Sarri G, Lumsden MA.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563217706381

Ann Clin Biochem. 2017;54(5):516-518.

Read Review