Heavy Metal Remediation Techniques for Cassava

Overview

Cassava (Manihot esculenta) is a dietary staple and food ingredient whose underground tubers can accumulate toxic heavy metals from soil and water. Recent surveillance indicates cassava often exhibits higher levels of key heavy metals, especially cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), than other root crops.^[1] These contaminants pose health risks (e.g., Pb-induced neurodevelopmental harm in children) and have led to “cautionary” cancer risk designations for cassava products in some regions.^[2] For manufacturers and retailers, heavy metal contamination in cassava ingredients (including cassava flour and purees used in infant nutrition) elevates the risk of regulatory non-compliance, product recalls, and brand damage. Targeted remediation steps from farm to factory, coupled with rigorous verification testing, can dramatically lower heavy metal levels and thereby reduce recall incidence and retailer liability. A coordinated approach spanning agricultural practices, processing interventions, and specification enforcement ensures cassava-derived foods meet safety standards and protect vulnerable consumers. This article reviews the heavy metal risk profile of cassava, evidence-based remediation techniques for growers and manufacturers, testing protocols for compliance, and economic levers that incentivize proactive contaminant control. The goal is to translate the latest regulatory science on heavy metals in cassava into practical strategies that clinicians, food brands, and retailers can use to prevent contamination, avoid costly recalls, and ensure safer products, especially in sensitive markets like infant nutrition.

Risk Profile for Cassava

Cassava is a robust root crop that can thrive in marginal soils, but this very resilience makes it prone to heavy metal uptake from contaminated environments. Its tuberous roots draw in metals present in soil or irrigation water, and prolonged cultivation on polluted land can lead to accumulation in edible tissues.^[3] Cadmium is of particular concern: cassava readily absorbs Cd, a highly mobile metal, leading to tuber Cd concentrations that often exceed those found in other staple crops.^[4]Lead and arsenic may also concentrate in cassava grown near industrial or mining areas, or when phosphate fertilizers (which often carry Cd/Pb impurities) are heavily used.^[5] Within the cassava root, heavy metals are not evenly distributed. Research shows the highest levels in the outer cortical peel and the central pith, whereas the starchy flesh contains lower concentrations.^[6] This anatomical localization means simple post-harvest measures (like peeling) can significantly reduce the metals in consumed portions. Table 1 summarizes key exposure drivers for heavy metal contamination in cassava and supporting evidence from recent studies.

Table 1. Exposure drivers and evidence

Driver	Evidence in cassava and heavy metal uptake
Contaminated soils (mining, waste)	Cassava tubers from gold mining zones accumulate elevated Hg, As, and Pb; one Ghanaian survey found 30% of cassava samples exceeded Codex lead limits (0.3 mg/kg) when grown on mining-impacted soil.[7] Near a gold mine, unprocessed cassava contained up to 0.426 mg/kg Hg (wet wt) and showed a hazard index >20 for arsenic in children.[8]
Agrochemical inputs (fertilizers, pesticides)	Repeated use of Cd– and Pb-containing agrochemicals elevates soil metal levels. In Kenyan farms intercropped with coffee (high agrochemical use), soil Cd and Pb were ~2× higher than in the low-input field.[9] Cassava from these high-input farms accumulated ~45% more Cd in tubers, linking fertilizer use to greater Cd uptake.[10]
Cassava varietal uptake traits	Different cassava cultivars exhibit varying metal bioaccumulation. Low heavy-metal-accumulating cultivars (LACs) can be used for “phytoexclusion,” yielding edible roots with significantly less Cd/Pb.[11] For example, Liu et al. report that selecting low-Cd cultivars is a viable strategy to keep tuber Cd below 0.1 mg/kg (dry) on mildly contaminated soils.[12][13]
Soil properties (pH and organic matter)	Acidic, low-organic soils promote heavy metal bioavailability to cassava roots.[14] Field studies note that cassava grown in low-pH (∼5–6) soils had 2–3 times higher Cd in tubers than in neutral soil, all else equal.[15] This is consistent with Cd desorption and increased root uptake under acidic conditions.
Anatomical localization (peel vs flesh)	Heavy metals concentrate in cassava’s peel (outer cortex) and fibrous core. In one study, Cd reached 5–8 mg/kg in peel/pith vs ~2.6 mg/kg in the fleshy interior.[16] Similarly, Pb was ~0.11 mg/kg in peel vs ~0.04 mg/kg in flesh.[17] Thus, consuming unpeeled or whole-ground cassava (e.g., some flours) carries higher metal exposure than consuming peeled roots.

Remediation for Suppliers/Growers

On-farm interventions focus on preventing or minimizing heavy metal uptake by cassava before harvest. Growers supplying cassava for food or ingredient use can adopt specific practices to limit metals in the harvested roots. One strategy is site selection and soil management: avoiding cultivation on known contaminated plots or ameliorating soil conditions to reduce metal bioavailability. For instance, applying soil amendments that immobilize metals (e.g. lime to raise pH, organic matter like biochar or manure to bind metals) can significantly curb root uptake of Cd and Pb. Another critical approach is cultivar selection. Farmers can plant cassava varieties documented to accumulate fewer heavy metals. Using these low-accumulating cultivars on marginally contaminated soils (a practice termed phytoexclusion) allows production of safer cassava while leaving most metals bound in the soil.^[18]Water and input controls are also important: irrigation sources should be tested for arsenic and other metals, and low-metal fertilizers (or reduced fertilizer application rates) should be chosen to avoid introducing contaminants.^[19] Finally, handling and processing at harvest can make a difference. Simply peeling cassava at harvest removes a major reservoir of metals (the cortex and skin) before the roots enter the food chain.^[20] Table 2 outlines practical remediation steps for suppliers/growers and their evidenced impacts.

Table 2. Supplier/Grower remediation steps

Action	Mechanism and efficacy (with conditions)
Use low-metal cultivars (phytoexclusion)	Plant cassava varieties bred or identified for low heavy metal uptake. Field trials show certain cultivars accumulate ~50% less Cd/Pb in tubers than standard varieties on the same soil.[21] By deploying low-accumulating cultivars in slightly polluted soils, growers can keep tuber metal levels within safe limits without phytoextracting contaminants into the food crop.
Soil amendments (lime, biochar, compost)	Apply amendments to bind heavy metals or reduce their bioavailability. For example, liming acidic soils raises pH and precipitates metal ions, cutting cassava’s Cd uptake (one study noted ~30% Cd reduction after liming to pH 7). Organic amendments (biochar, manure) immobilize metals in soil matrices; combined biochar + manure has been reported to reduce cassava tuber As and Pb content by >50%.[22] These amendments must be well-mixed into fields and maintained over seasons for sustained effect.
Clean inputs (low-Cd fertilizer, tested water)	Prevent introducing metals via agricultural inputs. Phosphate fertilizers are a known Cd source[23]; switching to certified low-Cd fertilizers or using them sparingly avoids adding ~0.5–1 mg/kg Cd to soil annually. Similarly, irrigation water should be tested for arsenic (common in groundwater of some regions); if As >10 µg/L, alternative water sources or rainfed farming is preferred to prevent chronic As accumulation in cassava.[24]
Field mapping and segregation	Identify and segregate plots with elevated heavy metals. Geospatial soil testing can flag “hotspots” (e.g., near roads or previous industrial use) where metal levels exceed safety for food crops. Cassava from high-metal sub-fields can be diverted for non-food uses or phytoremediation. In practice, a supplier might exclude 10% of acreage that contributes >50% of total Pb load, focusing food production on cleaner land parcels. This targeted exclusion reduces overall tuber Pb content, as demonstrated in Nigeria, where excluding cassava grown adjacent to highways cuts average Pb in the crop by half.[25]
Peel and trim at harvest	Remove metal-rich tissues immediately post-harvest. Peeling cassava roots (and discarding the cortex and outer layers) eliminates a significant portion of accumulated metals.[26] In a controlled comparison, peeled cassava had ~40% less Cd and Pb than unpeeled roots from the same field.[27] Likewise, trimming the fibrous stem-end (which can concentrate metals from the stalk interface) further reduces heavy metal content in the marketable tuber. These simple post-harvest steps can be done on-farm before distribution to processors.

Remediation for Manufacturing Facilities and Brands

Once cassava arrives at a processing facility (or manufacturing plant), additional controls can further reduce heavy metal content in the finished ingredient or product. Unlike acute pathogens, heavy metals cannot be “killed” or destroyed by processing, but strategic unit operations can partition or remove metals from the edible fraction. Initial washing and peeling at intake is a basic step: thorough washing removes soil particles (a source of lead or arsenic-laden dust), and any remaining peels are removed to drop the metal load.^[28] For wet processing (such as producing cassava starch or puree), soaking and leaching techniques are valuable. Metals like Cd and arsenic can leach out into processing water under the right conditions. For instance, mildly acidified soaking brine will solubilize some of the metals, which are then discarded with the soaking water. Another high-impact intervention is thermal processing. Boiling, blanching or steaming cassava can reduce heavy metal levels by transferring metals into the cooking water or making them bind to removed tissue. A recent study in Ghana demonstrated that traditional boiling of cassava roots reduced Hg content by ~70% and Cd by ~60–75%, effectively diminishing the health risk.^[29]Solid–liquid separation steps inherent in cassava processing also play a role. In making cassava flour, for example, grating and pressing the pulp can expel some metal-containing juices, and subsequent drying concentrates mostly starch (which tends to have lower metal content than fibrous fractions). Similarly, producing tapioca starch involves wet milling, settling, and decanting steps that naturally leave behind heavier particulate matter (potentially binding metals) and yield a purer starch with less Pb and Cd.^[30][31] Finally, manufacturers must implement rigorous quality control programs such as supplier qualification and lot segregation. This includes sourcing cassava only from vetted suppliers with acceptable heavy metal levels and segregating incoming lots that test high, to avoid cross-contaminating large production batches. Table 3 details several manufacturing-stage controls with their purposes and quantitatively observed benefits.

Table 3. Manufacturing/Brand controls

Control	Purpose and validated effect (parameters)
Intake washing and peeling	Remove external contaminants and high-metal parts. Industrial washing of cassava roots (high-pressure spray or agitation) removes soil residues containing Pb/As from mining dust.[32] Peeling (mechanical or by knife) eliminates the cortex that held ~50–70% of total Cd burden.[33] Together, washing + peeling can cut total Pb and Cd in raw cassava by approximately one-half, before further processing (effectiveness confirmed by side-by-side assays of washed/peeled vs unwashed roots).[34]
Blanching/Boiling (thermal leaching)	Leach out metals into water during cooking. Simmering peeled cassava chunks in water for 15–20 min causes diffusible metals to migrate out. Fobi et al. found boiling reduced Hg by 65–80%, As by 85–95%, and Cd by ~60–75% in cassava, rendering final levels generally below WHO standards.[35] Key parameters: high water-to-cassava ratio, discard the cooking water, and avoid reabsorbing the broth. Blanching (short boil) is similarly effective for surface-bound Pb removal, achieving >50% Pb reduction in cassava leaves and peels as well.[36]
Wet milling and decantation	Partition metals into by-products. In cassava starch manufacture, roots are crushed in water and the mixture is settled; heavy metals tend to associate with fibrous pulp and cell debris that sink or can be filtered out. Anecdotal industry data (and related findings in rice starch processing) indicate that refined cassava starch has substantially lower Pb levels than whole cassava flour.[37][38] The wet separation process thus inherently “purifies” the product. Manufacturers can enhance this by adding a clarification step (centrifugation or fine filtration) to remove any particulate-bound metals before drying.
Supplier qualification program	Ensure consistent low-metal raw material. Brands should source cassava from growers who adhere to remediation practices and meet a heavy metal specification. For example, a manufacturer might require all incoming cassava flour to have <0.05 mg/kg Cd and <0.1 mg/kg Pb. Lots from regions with naturally higher metals (e.g., cassava from limestone areas with high soil Cd) would be excluded.[39] This program often includes periodic farm audits and testing of samples from each supplier. By pre-selecting low-risk suppliers, downstream processing steps are less likely to face high metal loads, thereby reducing the chance of finished product failures.
Lot segregation and blending	Manage variability between batches. If an incoming lot shows marginally elevated metal levels, a company can either segregate it (preventing its inclusion in food production) or blend it with a larger volume of low-metal material to dilute the contaminants. Blending must be done cautiously and validated by composite testing to ensure the final mix meets specifications. Given that heavy metal distribution can be heterogeneous,[40] any blending strategy requires robust sampling to avoid “hot spots” of high contamination. Many manufacturers choose to segregate (reject or relegate to non-food use) any lot that exceeds internal action levels, rather than rely on dilution, to eliminate recall risk.

Verification, Testing, and Decision Rules

Even with robust remediation steps, verification testing is the backstop that ensures heavy metal levels in cassava ingredients remain within safe limits before products reach consumers. Manufacturers and retailers should design heavy metal specifications that define acceptable levels and outline actions if limits are exceeded. Typically, a specification will list the analyte panel (e.g., As, Cd, Pb, Hg) and maximum allowable concentrations for each metal in the cassava-containing product. These limits often align with or are stricter than international standards. For example, Codex Alimentarius has set guideline maximum levels for lead in root vegetables around 0.1–0.3 mg/kg,^[41] but a baby food manufacturer might adopt an internal spec of <0.05 mg/kg Pb to provide an extra safety margin for infants. Child-focused products generally warrant tougher standards because infants’ neurological development is uniquely vulnerable to heavy metals.^[42] Verification entails a sampling plan to represent each lot or batch: composite sampling can be used to estimate average metal content, but producers must be cautious that composites do not mask localized spikes. Many companies sample multiple random roots or flour samples per lot and test each (or at least test composites of defined subsets) to catch any outlier. All testing should be done with validated analytical methods, usually ICP-MS or ICP-OES/AAS for heavy metals, given the low detection limits required (in the parts-per-billion range for infant foods). Importantly, decision rules must be in place to handle results: if any lot exceeds the spec, it should trigger non-release (quarantine and either rework, rejection, or diversion of that lot) and a corrective action investigation. Table 4 summarizes key elements of specification design and verification for heavy metals in cassava products.

Table 4. Specification design and verification

Spec element	Rationale and evidence
Analyte panel (As, Cd, Pb, Hg)	Test the “big four” toxic heavy metals, which pose the greatest risk in foods.[43] These are among the WHO’s top ten chemicals of concern and are known to occur in cassava products.[44] Including all four in routine testing ensures that any significant contamination (e.g., Pb from soil, As from water, Cd from fertilizer, or Hg from industrial fallout) is caught. Other metals (e.g., chromium, nickel) are optional based on source and regulatory focus, but As, Cd, Pb, Hg cover the main hazard spectrum for root crops.
Limits and action levels	Set numeric limits per metal that trigger action. Regulatory benchmarks provide a starting point (e.g., Codex limit for Pb in cassava flour ~0.1–0.3 mg/kg;[45] EU infant food Cd limit 0.04 mg/kg). Internal limits are often tighter. The goal is to keep exposures well below provisional tolerable intakes. For instance, a brand may adopt 50 ppb (0.05 mg/kg) Pb and 20 ppb Cd as maximums in finished cassava-based baby food. These levels ensure a large safety factor given children’s lower thresholds.[46] If test results exceed an action level, that lot is withheld from release and investigated.
Child-focused criteria	If cassava ingredients are used in infant or toddler foods, apply more stringent “child-specific” limits. Children have higher intake per body weight and greater vulnerability to neurotoxic effects of metals.[47] As evidence, Owusu-Agyemang Fobi et al. showed that unprocessed cassava near mining sites had hazard index >20 for arsenic in children, versus <1 in adults.[48] To address this, companies often cut allowable limits by 2–4× for products intended for young ages. Some may also increase testing frequency or require every lot (not just periodic composite) to be tested for child-designated foods.
Sampling plan (composites vs individual)	Heavy metals can be heterogeneously distributed in cassava (between fields, among roots, even within a root).[49] Thus, a composite sample of many roots or packages will give a reliable average but might dilute a hotspot. A rigorous plan might require, for example, taking 10 incremental samples from a 20-ton lot, testing them individually for worst-case assessment, and also as a composite for lot average. If any single-sample exceeds, the lot can be flagged despite the composite being under the limit. This approach balances practical testing load with the need to detect outliers. Using statistically based sampling (e.g., ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 tables or similar) helps define how many samples to test per lot to be confident in compliance.
Analytical method and validation	Specify the use of sensitive, accredited methods like ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) or AAS (atomic absorption spectroscopy) for quantifying metals.[50] These methods have detection limits in low µg/kg and are standard in heavy metal analysis of foods. The lab (in-house or third-party) should run appropriate blanks, spiked recoveries, and reference materials (e.g., NIST standard cassava flour) to validate accuracy. Turnaround time is also critical: rapid methods or in-house ICP enable “test and hold” so that products are not shipped before results. Only upon passing all spec criteria is a lot released for distribution.

Economic Risk Management for Retailers and Brands

Investing in heavy-metal controls for cassava ingredients carries an upfront cost but substantially lowers recall probability and downstream liability. Heavy-metal recalls are uniquely expensive because they entail product withdrawal, regulatory scrutiny, and durable trust erosion. A modest annual testing-and-sourcing program can avert a single recall that would otherwise cost several million dollars in lost sales and crisis response. For infant products, the stakes are higher, so retailers increasingly seek suppliers with rigorous controls and independent certification. Table 5 summarizes high-leverage economic decisions that reduce recall exposure while preserving margin.

Table 5. Economic levers and risk

Lever or decision	Cost–benefit rationale and risk impact
Pre-harvest segregation vs post-harvest blending	Excluding high-metal fields prevents “hot lots” from entering the food stream, whereas blending risks uneven dilution. Given cassava metal variability[26],[51] a few highly contaminated roots can spike a batch; segregation therefore averts recall costs that far exceed the small volume loss.
Intensive third-party certification	Certification adds sampling/audit cost but lowers recall probability and strengthens retail acceptance. Liu et al. highlight the breadth of heavy-metal issues in tuber crops, justifying rigorous control measures[52]; certified “heavy-metal tested” products reduce compliance uncertainty and potential multi-million-dollar recall exposure.
Incoming lot test-and-hold	Testing each lot of flour/starch on receipt and quarantining until results clear adds lab and holding costs but intercepts non-conforming material. In regions where ~30% of cassava samples exceed Pb limits,[53] test-and-hold prevents contaminated inputs from reaching production and avoids recall/rework expenses.
Liability and brand protection	Maintaining metals below health-risk thresholds reduces legal exposure and preserves consumer trust. Because elevated lead can irreversibly harm children,[54] proactive controls—from farm through release testing—function as insurance against existential brand and litigation risk.

Evidence Scope and Applicability

Evidence on heavy metals in cassava is heterogeneous across geographies, soils, and cultivars, which limits direct generalization of absolute concentrations and effect sizes. Uptake varies with soil chemistry and agronomy, and most studies are localized case series rather than multi-site trials. Processing reductions also depend on parameters such as peel removal and water-to-cassava ratios. These factors do not undermine the directionality of controls but caution against assuming uniform magnitudes of risk reduction in all supply chains. Continued surveillance and periodic method validation ensure that site-specific realities are reflected in specifications and supplier programs.

A combined strategy—clean sourcing and cultivars upstream, peel removal and wet processing in-plant, and ICP-based verification—consistently drives Pb and Cd down in cassava ingredients while protecting infant-focused products. Supplier qualification, test-and-hold, and conservative action limits reduce recall probability and legal exposure at costs far lower than a single market withdrawal. For retailers, insisting on documented controls and periodic third-party sampling offers measurable assurance without impeding throughput. These measures translate regulatory toxicology into predictable, auditable performance across cassava supply chains.

References

1. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils Around Industrial Enterprises in Lanzhou, China: A Multi-Industry Perspective Promoting Land Sustainability.. Duan K, Li Y, Yang W, Lin Y, Rao L, Han C.. (Sustainability. 2025)
2. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils Around Industrial Enterprises in Lanzhou, China: A Multi-Industry Perspective Promoting Land Sustainability.. Duan K, Li Y, Yang W, Lin Y, Rao L, Han C.. (Sustainability. 2025)
3. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
4. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
5. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
6. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
7. Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Foodstuffs from Agricultural Soils around Tarkwa Area in Ghana, and Associated Human Health Risks.. Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Akoto O, Ikenaka Y, Fobil JN, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, Ishizuka M.. (Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015)
8. Effect of Boiling on Heavy Metal and Cyanide Concentrations and Associated Health Risks in Cassava and Cocoyam From a Gold Mining Area in Kade, Ghana.. Fobi COA, Eshun G, Kwarteng TA, Amponsah AS, Adoma PO.. (Int J Food Sci. 2025)
9. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
10. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
11. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil—Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events.. Sánchez-Castro I, Molina L, Prieto-Fernandez M-A, Segura A.. (Heliyon. 2023)
12. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils Around Industrial Enterprises in Lanzhou, China: A Multi-Industry Perspective Promoting Land Sustainability.. Duan K, Li Y, Yang W, Lin Y, Rao L, Han C.. (Sustainability. 2025)
13. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil—Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events.. Sánchez-Castro I, Molina L, Prieto-Fernandez M-A, Segura A.. (Heliyon. 2023)
14. Comparison of metal bioaccumulation in crop types and consumable parts between two growth periods.. Awino FB, Maher W, Lynch AJJ, Asanga Fai PB, Otim O.. (Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2022)
15. Comparison of metal bioaccumulation in crop types and consumable parts between two growth periods.. Awino FB, Maher W, Lynch AJJ, Asanga Fai PB, Otim O.. (Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2022)
16. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
17. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
18. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil—Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events.. Sánchez-Castro I, Molina L, Prieto-Fernandez M-A, Segura A.. (Heliyon. 2023)
19. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
20. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
21. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil—Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events.. Sánchez-Castro I, Molina L, Prieto-Fernandez M-A, Segura A.. (Heliyon. 2023)
22. Cassava (Manihot esculenta) yield, nutrition, and heavy metal bioaccumulation responses to circular economy-based innovations in a mining-degraded landscape.. Asante KOH, Abugre S, Akoto DS, Derkyi NSA.. (International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2023)
23. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
24. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
25. Heavy metal contamination in urban roadside vegetables: origins, exposure pathways, and health implications.. Boahen E.. (Discover Environment. 2024)
26. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
27. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
28. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
29. Effect of Boiling on Heavy Metal and Cyanide Concentrations and Associated Health Risks in Cassava and Cocoyam From a Gold Mining Area in Kade, Ghana.. Fobi COA, Eshun G, Kwarteng TA, Amponsah AS, Adoma PO.. (Int J Food Sci. 2025)
30. Consumption of gluten-free products increases heavy metal intake.. Wünsche J, Lambert C, Gola U, Biesalski HK.. (NFS Journal. 2018)
31. Consumption of gluten-free products increases heavy metal intake.. Wünsche J, Lambert C, Gola U, Biesalski HK.. (NFS Journal. 2018)
32. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
33. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
34. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
35. Effect of Boiling on Heavy Metal and Cyanide Concentrations and Associated Health Risks in Cassava and Cocoyam From a Gold Mining Area in Kade, Ghana.. Fobi COA, Eshun G, Kwarteng TA, Amponsah AS, Adoma PO.. (Int J Food Sci. 2025)
36. Effect of Boiling on Heavy Metal and Cyanide Concentrations and Associated Health Risks in Cassava and Cocoyam From a Gold Mining Area in Kade, Ghana.. Fobi COA, Eshun G, Kwarteng TA, Amponsah AS, Adoma PO.. (Int J Food Sci. 2025)
37. Consumption of gluten-free products increases heavy metal intake.. Wünsche J, Lambert C, Gola U, Biesalski HK.. (NFS Journal. 2018)
38. Consumption of gluten-free products increases heavy metal intake.. Wünsche J, Lambert C, Gola U, Biesalski HK.. (NFS Journal. 2018)
39. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
40. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
41. Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Foodstuffs from Agricultural Soils around Tarkwa Area in Ghana, and Associated Human Health Risks.. Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Akoto O, Ikenaka Y, Fobil JN, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, Ishizuka M.. (Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015)
42. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
43. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
44. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
45. Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Foodstuffs from Agricultural Soils around Tarkwa Area in Ghana, and Associated Human Health Risks.. Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Akoto O, Ikenaka Y, Fobil JN, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, Ishizuka M.. (Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015)
46. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
47. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)
48. Effect of Boiling on Heavy Metal and Cyanide Concentrations and Associated Health Risks in Cassava and Cocoyam From a Gold Mining Area in Kade, Ghana.. Fobi COA, Eshun G, Kwarteng TA, Amponsah AS, Adoma PO.. (Int J Food Sci. 2025)
49. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
50. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
51. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Soils and Tuber Parts under Intercropping and Single-Cropping Systems.. Mutuku JM, Wekesa C, Muthini D, et al.. (Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2024)
52. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils Around Industrial Enterprises in Lanzhou, China: A Multi-Industry Perspective Promoting Land Sustainability.. Duan K, Li Y, Yang W, Lin Y, Rao L, Han C.. (Sustainability. 2025)
53. Accumulation of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Foodstuffs from Agricultural Soils around Tarkwa Area in Ghana, and Associated Human Health Risks.. Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Akoto O, Ikenaka Y, Fobil JN, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, Ishizuka M.. (Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015)
54. Safety of cassava and cassava-based products: a systematic review.. Forkum AT, Wung AE, Kelese MT, Ndum CM, Lontum A, Kamga EB, Nsaikila MN, Okwen PM.. (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;)