What was studied
This cadmium-rice-risk-assessment study measured cadmium (Cd) concentrations in domestically produced Taiwanese rice and then estimated long-term dietary exposure and non-cancer risk from rice consumption across age–gender groups using probabilistic modeling. The authors analyzed 1,581 rice samples collected from multiple production areas and markets across Taiwan (2010–2018 sampling window referenced in results) and quantified Cd using an ICP-MS method aligned with Taiwan Food and Drug Administration guidance. They then modeled lifetime average daily dose (LADD) and a hazard index (HI) with Monte Carlo simulation (100,000 iterations) using rice Cd concentrations, age-specific rice intake distributions, and body weight distributions. For risk benchmarking, they used the EFSA benchmark intake basis (0.36 μg/kg body weight/day as the reference point in HI calculations).
Who was studied
No individuals were enrolled or clinically examined; the “population” was modeled using Taiwanese national dietary consumption and body weight data stratified by sex and seven age bands: 0–3, 4–6, 7–12, 13–15, 16–18, 19–65, and >65 years. Exposure estimates were generated for “consumer-only” subgroups, meaning people who actually consumed rice, with intake rates derived from the National Food Consumption Database (NAHSIT 2018). This approach is directly relevant to certification programs because it links measured contaminant levels in a staple food to real-world, high-frequency consumption patterns rather than assuming generic global diets.
Most important findings
For HMTC decision-making, the critical takeaway is that compliance with a legal maximum level did not guarantee low risk at high consumption: Cd was detected in most samples, mean levels were modest, yet modeled high-end consumers frequently exceeded an HI of 1. Region and soil conditions also mattered, with Yilan standing out as the highest-risk area, suggesting targeted monitoring and source control can outperform uniform sampling alone.
| Critical point | Details |
|---|---|
| Detection frequency and central tendency | Cd was detected in 89% of rice samples, with an average concentration of 0.04 ± 0.04 mg/kg (n=1581), indicating widespread low-level presence rather than rare spikes. |
| Regulatory compliance vs. risk | All measured Cd concentrations were below Taiwan’s maximum level of 0.4 mg/kg, yet modeled P95 consumers had HI values >1 across all age groups, meaning potential non-cancer risk at the high end of consumption even when products meet the legal limit. |
| High-risk subpopulations by intake | In probabilistic outputs, males 0–3 years had LADD P95 = 1.34 μg/kg/day and HI P95 = 3.79; adult males 19–65 years had HI P95 = 1.54. The driver is portion size relative to body weight, which is especially consequential for children. |
| Geographic hotspot for certification targeting | The HI heat map identified Yilan as the highest-risk region (consumer P50 HI about 0.63; narrative summary notes highest exposure and calls for additional monitoring), implying that origin-based certification thresholds and intensified lot testing could be justified. |
| Trend signal over time | Average Cd concentrations reportedly increased slightly from about 0.04 mg/kg (2010) to 0.06 mg/kg (2018), suggesting that surveillance should be continuous and that certification programs should watch for slow drift, not only acute events. |
| Practical mitigation relevant to product handling | The authors note evidence that soaking/rinsing can reduce heavy metals in rice and recommend it to consumers, but they also clarify their measurements were in raw rice without these steps, which matters when defining what HMTC certification represents (raw commodity vs. prepared food). |
| Policy lever explicitly proposed | Taiwan’s Cd maximum level (0.4 mg/kg) matches Codex and is double China’s 0.2 mg/kg; the authors suggest adopting the stricter standard to reduce intake in a high-rice-consumption population, aligning with certification programs that aim to be more protective than minimum legal compliance. |
Key implications
This cadmium-rice-risk-assessment supports tighter, exposure-based regulation because high-end consumers can exceed HI>1 even when rice meets a 0.4 mg/kg legal limit, so certification should incorporate consumption-sensitive thresholds and not rely on pass/fail compliance alone. HMTC requirements could include lower internal action levels, origin/region traceability, and intensified testing for hotspots like Yilan, alongside periodic trend review to catch gradual increases. Industry applications include supplier qualification using soil and irrigation risk indicators, lot-level screening, and transparent labeling that specifies the tested state (raw grain) to avoid overstating consumer-level risk reduction from cooking. Research gaps include multi-food cumulative Cd exposure, interactions with other metals, and measured effects of rinsing/soaking on certified lots, with practical recommendations focused on targeted monitoring, stricter internal limits, and validation of preprocessing claims.
Citation
Lien K-W, Pan M-H, Ling M-P. Levels of heavy metal cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.) produced in Taiwan and probabilistic risk assessment for the Taiwanese population. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28:28381-28390. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11902-w
Cadmium is a persistent heavy metal that accumulates in kidneys and bones. Dietary sources include cereals, cocoa, shellfish and vegetables, while smokers and industrial workers receive higher exposures. Studies link cadmium to kidney dysfunction, bone fractures and cancer.