Pregnancy Blood Mercury and Fish Consumption: HTMC Policy Original paper

Researched by:

  • Dr. Umar Aitsaam ID
    Dr. Umar Aitsaam

    User avatarClinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

    Read More

October 27, 2025

Researched by:

  • Dr. Umar Aitsaam ID
    Dr. Umar Aitsaam

    User avatarClinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

    Read More

Last Updated: 2025-10-27

Our team of researchers are constantly monitoring and summarizing the latest research,
and we continue to update our pages to ensure you have the most accurate information.

Note on the last update: One new meta analysis added

Dr. Umar Aitsaam

Clinical Pharmacist and Master’s student in Clinical Pharmacy with research interests in pharmacovigilance, behavioral interventions in mental health, and AI applications in clinical decision support. Experience includes digital health research with Bloomsbury Health (London) and pharmacovigilance practice in patient support programs. Published work covers drug awareness among healthcare providers, postpartum depression management, and patient safety reporting.

What was studied?

This prospective cohort study investigated pregnancy blood mercury and fish consumption in relation to infant birth outcomes within the UK-based ALSPAC cohort. The authors measured whole blood mercury via ICP-MS in early pregnancy and linked exposures to birthweight, head circumference, crown–heel length, low birthweight, and preterm delivery. Analyses considered confounders such as maternal age, BMI, education, smoking, alcohol, parity, infant sex, and gestational age, with an additional model adjusting for blood selenium. Stratified models compared fish-eaters with non-fish-eaters and oily-fish-eaters with non-oily-fish-eaters to disentangle nutrient benefits from contaminant risks central to pregnancy, blood mercury, and fish consumption guidance.

Who was studied?

Participants were 4,044 singleton live births from ALSPAC, a population-based birth cohort in southwest England recruiting pregnant women with expected delivery between April 1991 and December 1992. Maternal blood for mercury and selenium was collected early in pregnancy; diet during late pregnancy was captured by a validated food-frequency questionnaire that classified white fish, oily fish, and shellfish intake. Fish-eaters were those consuming white and/or oily fish at least once per two weeks; non-fish-eaters reported “never/rarely.” The cohort’s social and demographic profile resembled national census data, offering generalizable insights relevant to pregnancy, blood mercury and fish consumption policy.

Most important findings

Critical pointDetails
Adjusted analyses found no adverse associationsAfter controlling for maternal and infant covariates, maternal blood mercury showed no significant associations with birthweight, head circumference, or crown–heel length; adding selenium did not change results.
Null findings for preterm and low birthweightAcross mercury tertiles, odds of preterm birth and low birthweight were not increased in adjusted models; a univariate protective trend for preterm lost significance after adjustment.
Fish consumption raised Hg but not riskFish-eaters had ~33% higher maternal blood mercury than non-fish-eaters, yet their infants had higher mean birthweight (+87.6 g), greater head circumference (+0.2 cm), and longer length (+0.4 cm); gestational age and preterm/LBW prevalence were similar.
Potential protection in fish-eatersIn stratified models, a negative association between mercury and birthweight appeared only in non-fish-eaters (B ≈ −58 g; p ≈ 0.04); fish-eaters showed no such association, suggesting nutrients in fish may offset mercury-related risk.
Oily fish stratification showed no harmFurther stratification into oily-fish-eaters vs non-oily-fish-eaters revealed no adverse associations of mercury with anthropometrics; scattered signals for LBW with higher mercury tertiles in oily-fish-eaters had wide confidence intervals and were not robust.
Exposure levels were moderateMean blood mercury levels resembled those in other developed countries and were generally below the US level-of-concern context cited by authors, supporting interpretation within typical population exposures.
Measurement strengthsEarly-pregnancy whole blood mercury and selenium measured by CDC-validated ICP-MS, with standardized outcome ascertainment and extensive confounder control, bolster causal interpretation for certification frameworks.

Key implications

For regulators, moderate maternal mercury typical of UK dietary patterns did not increase risks of low birthweight or preterm birth, implying HTMC thresholds can align with real-world exposures while preserving nutritional benefits. Certification should emphasize species-based mercury limits, encourage pregnancy blood mercury and fish consumption consistent with two portions weekly, including one oily fish, and require clear consumer guidance. Industry can prioritize low-mercury species sourcing and transparent labeling. Research gaps include co-exposure profiling and dose–response at higher exposures. Practical guidance should couple mercury caps with nutrient benchmarks and validated risk communication.

Citation

Taylor CM, Golding J, Emond AM. Blood mercury levels and fish consumption in pregnancy: Risks and benefits for birth outcomes in a prospective observational birth cohort. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2016. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.05.004